Skip to content

Ritornel, Op. 25

by Vítězslava Kaprálová

Instrumentation
Cello, Piano
Composed
1940
Duration
4'15''
Publisher
Bärenreiter

Purchase or download

About this piece

Kaprálová wrote her Ritornel for cello and piano in Paris in 1940, the last year of her life. It was planned as the first of 'Deux ritournelles pour violoncelle et piano', Op. 25, but only the first was completed; the second survives only as an autograph fragment held in Brno. The Boston Symphony Orchestra's programme for a Tanglewood recital by Yo-Yo Ma and Emanuel Ax called it 'brief, energetic' and 'among her last completed works'. It was first performed, under the title Ritornello, by Karel Neumann (cello) and Vilém Tauský (piano) at the Czechoslovak Institute in London on 18 May 1941, almost a year after the composer's death. Recordings include Ivan Měrka with Jaroslav Smykal (Studio Matouš, 1998), Franz Bartolomey with Clemens Zeilinger (Gramola, 2018), Anna Fortová with Kathrin Schmidlin (Claves, 2020) and Štěpán Filípek with Katelyn Bouska (Radioservis, 2023). The score was published in 2003 by Bärenreiter Praha (H 7827, edited by Miloš Štědroň, 10-page score) with support from the Kapralova Society.

Technical overview

A single movement of about 4¼ minutes. It is an energetic, rhythmically driven recital piece in Kaprálová's late Paris idiom, and the cello and piano are equal partners.

Level rubric

Advanced

Left Hand

  • Unrestricted fingerboard operation.
  • Effortless high‑register passages with thumb position.
  • Execute large leaps, rapid shifts & fast runs with precise intonation.
  • Render double stops with clarity and even vibrato.
  • Crisp, stylistically appropriate ornamentation (trills, turns, mordents).
  • Instinctive micro‑adjustments in intonation for expressiveness.
  • False harmonics in low positions

Right Hand

  • Complete command of all bow strokes at any tempo/dynamic.
  • Comfortable execution of virtuoso passages (sautillé, intricate ricochet).
  • Tone projection from whisper‑quiet to fortissimo.
  • Integrate advanced bow patterns with expressive phrasing.
  • Demonstrate technical precision with a broad dynamic range.

Rhythm & Musicality

  • Interpret large‑scale structures with nuanced pacing and rhythmic freedom.
  • Highly refined phrasing with subtle note grouping & expressive rubato.
  • Convey emotional depth and stylistic authenticity.
  • Incorporate personal interpretive choices while meeting stylistic demands.

Levels are approximate guides, not strict requirements.